Project management tools can't be chosen on "can it list tasks" alone. Phases, ownership, milestones, progress, and the connection to operational data like orders, billing, and cost all decide whether delivery planning and execution stay consistent. When task management stands alone, progress and billing/cost end up managed separately, and project profitability goes dark.
This guide compares the options for project management — generic task tools, dedicated PM/PSA tools, spreadsheets, and Sanka.
Decide these first
| Decision | What to confirm |
|---|---|
| Planning | How phases, milestones, and dependencies are managed |
| Ownership and progress | How assignment and progress/delays are surfaced |
| Profitability | How effort, cost, and billing connect to progress |
| Workflow connection | How orders, contracts, and billing connect to projects |
Comparison summary
| Option | Best for | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|
| Generic task tools | Running tasks lightly | Weak links to profitability and business data |
| Dedicated PM/PSA | Teams managing effort and profitability | Broad scope; needs CRM/billing integration design |
| Spreadsheets | Few projects | Progress, profitability, and history depend on people |
| Sanka | Teams governing delivery tied to orders, billing, and cost | Overkill if you only need task management |
1. Generic task tools
To run tasks lightly, generic tools are a candidate. Easy and flexible, but links to profitability data — effort, cost, billing — and to orders and contracts are weak, so project profitability usually needs another system.
2. Dedicated PM/PSA
To manage effort and profitability seriously, dedicated PM/PSA tools are a candidate. Planning and profitability features are rich, but scope is broad and CRM/billing integration design is a prerequisite.
3. Spreadsheets
With few projects, spreadsheets work. Flexible, but people must keep phases, ownership, progress, and profitability consistent, and the latest status gets hard to follow as volume grows.
4. Sanka
Sanka fits teams that want to govern delivery with phases, ownership, and milestones while keeping project records aligned with operational data — orders, contracts, billing, cost. It keeps planning, execution, and profitability consistent and lets you review project status and economics on the same base.
Related pages:
Which one to choose
For light task running, generic tools fit; for effort and profitability, dedicated PM/PSA; with few projects, spreadsheets get you started. If the gap is governing delivery tied to orders, billing, and cost through to profitability, Sanka is practical because it aligns project records with business data.
